[MacPorts] #20315: digikam-0.10.0 new port submission
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Wed Jul 15 09:13:16 PDT 2009
#20315: digikam-0.10.0 new port submission
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: rechner@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
Type: submission | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 1.7.1
Keywords: | Port: digikam
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Old description:
> In February this year I already created a Portfile for digikam and sent
> it to the [http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-
> users/2009-February/013816.html macports users list]. But no one picked
> it up, and included it in the repositories.
> So now I try it via trac, the proper way.
>
> During the LONG process of building all dependencies (on my good old G4)
> I stumbled upon two problems, one in kdegraphics4 (on a case-sensitive
> file-system) (#20313) and one in qca (#20314).
>
> First I tried to use digiKam 1.0 beta 2, and even succeeded installing
> it, but it keeps crashing, so it might be to early for a ticket?
>
> I'm not sure if this version needs kdegraphics4 at all, but digikam 1.0
> definitely needs it, so the dependency might as well stay in here
> already.
New description:
In February this year I already created a Portfile for digikam and sent it
to the [http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-
users/2009-February/013816.html macports users list]. But no one picked it
up, and included it in the repositories.
So now I try it via trac, the proper way.
During the LONG process of building all dependencies (on my good old G4) I
stumbled upon two problems, one in kdegraphics4 (on a case-sensitive file-
system) (#20313) and one in qca (#20314).
First I tried to use digiKam 1.0 beta 2, and even succeeded installing it,
but it keeps crashing, so it might be too early for a ticket?
I'm not sure if this version needs kdegraphics4 at all, but digikam 1.0
definitely needs it, so the dependency might as well stay in here already.
--
Comment(by macsforever2000@…):
Replying to [comment:2 rechner@…]:
> Typo: In the line on digiKam 1.0 it has to be "too early", not "to
early".
Fixed. :)
A couple of notes about your portfile submission:
- The "{{{revision 0}}}" line is unnecessary and should be removed.
- In the {{{long_description}}} line, the word "applications" should be
"application".
- The {{{distname}}} line is redundant and should be removed since that
is the default.
- I do not understand this line: "{{{configure.args-append
../${distname}}}}". Does it really need that to configure?
- Are you willing to be the maintainer for this port?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/20315#comment:3>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list