[MacPorts] #20103: Use a common default variant for a recent gcc port in scientific packages
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Tue Jun 30 07:17:40 PDT 2009
#20103: Use a common default variant for a recent gcc port in scientific packages
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: alakazam@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
Type: update | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 1.7.1
Keywords: | Port: octave arpack
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment(by alakazam@…):
I'm all for having reasonnable exceptions, but I think we can agree that
the current situation clearly isn't about following a rule with a couple
of exceptions.
And to clarify my initial post, I don't think personally that we should
have only one variant, only that all ports that can use the same compiler
do so by default. What variants would you suggest we keep ? For your ports
for instance, what would be your choice of a default variant, and why ?
This is clearly not about being pushy, but rather about user convenience
:)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/20103#comment:5>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list