[MacPorts] #19004: Sticky versions?

MacPorts noreply at macports.org
Sat Mar 28 10:07:39 PDT 2009


#19004: Sticky versions?
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 Reporter:  macports@…                |       Owner:  macports-tickets@…                   
     Type:  enhancement               |      Status:  new                                  
 Priority:  Normal                    |   Milestone:  MacPorts 1.7.1                       
Component:  ports                     |     Version:  1.7.0                                
 Keywords:                            |        Port:                                       
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment(by mcalhoun@…):

 Replying to [comment:3 macports@…]:
 > I'm using Subversive since it's hosted by Eclipse, but it only supports
 Subversion 1.5.
 > Anyway, I'll look at the local repository solution.  It looks kinda
 overkill, though...
 Granted, it may not be ideal, but sticky versions are a little dangerous
 in and of themselves.[[BR]]
 Portfiles maintainers rely on the fact that they know exactly how the
 other ports are installed (at least if the user is fully upgraded).[[BR]]
 If you take that away with sticky versions, then maintenance becomes much
 harder.[[BR]]
 I would vote against such a change.

 I keep a local repository myself, so please let me know if you run into
 any problems.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/19004#comment:4>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS


More information about the macports-tickets mailing list