[MacPorts] #21389: Customized umask setting produces wrong permissions on installed files on Snow Leopard (was: Wrong permissions in lib/db46, e.g. libdb-4.6.dylib)

MacPorts noreply at macports.org
Tue Sep 15 15:34:03 PDT 2009


#21389: Customized umask setting produces wrong permissions on installed files on
Snow Leopard
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  m@…               |       Owner:  blair@…           
      Type:  defect            |      Status:  reopened          
  Priority:  Normal            |   Milestone:  MacPorts Future   
 Component:  base              |     Version:  1.8.0             
Resolution:                    |    Keywords:  snowleopard       
      Port:                    |  
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by raimue@…):

  * status:  closed => reopened
  * component:  ports => base
  * milestone:  => MacPorts Future
  * keywords:  => snowleopard
  * resolution:  worksforme =>
  * port:  db46 =>


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:3 m@…]:
 > However, it worked before and still works for other ports. So, my umask
 setting should not be the actual cause (defect).

 I have encountered the same problem and apparently sudo handles umask
 differently on Snow Leopard by inheriting the user's umask. We just need a
 way to deal with this new behavior. This is not a problem for ports using
 /usr/bin/install and xinstall as this explicitely changes the permissions,
 but for everything using e.g. cp or file copy this can be an issue. Also
 the receipt files and everything else MacPorts creates (distfiles, build
 directories, work symlink) will have the "wrong" permissions.

 My proposal is to add a new --with-umask setting to the configure script
 in the same style we already have --with-install-user, --with-install-
 group and --with-directory-mode. It would default to 0022.

 Changing the umask setting affects the current process and any new forks,
 so after loading the macports Tcl extension it would be changed for this
 process. Could this be a problem for any software?

 The alternative would be to explicitely set permissions on every file
 creation which would be complicated and require rewrite where we use Tcl
 API (e.g. file copy).

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/21389#comment:7>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS


More information about the macports-tickets mailing list