[MacPorts] #21544: libsdl 1.2.14 checksum failed

[MacPorts]

#21544: libsdl 1.2.14 checksum failed
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  senz@…        |       Owner:  ryandesign@…           
      Type:  defect        |      Status:  closed                 
  Priority:  Normal        |   Milestone:                         
 Component:  ports         |     Version:  1.8.0                  
Resolution:  fixed         |    Keywords:  SDL 1.2.14 checksum    
      Port:  libsdl        |  
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------

Comment(by js-macports@…):

 It's happening again:

 {{{
 Error: Checksum (md5) mismatch for SDL-1.2.14.tar.gz
 Portfile checksum: SDL-1.2.14.tar.gz md5 18895c7865c971e7e6c00bdd97e697ca
 Distfile checksum: SDL-1.2.14.tar.gz md5 1c4203d2dffbde5a333fa6e9620e38b8
 Error: Checksum (sha1) mismatch for SDL-1.2.14.tar.gz
 Portfile checksum: SDL-1.2.14.tar.gz sha1
 cb2239860b41821150f4208435aee08987bec0cd
 Distfile checksum: SDL-1.2.14.tar.gz sha1
 8e083e9dcaff346f5bec143fc5f1808488dc99f5
 Error: Checksum (rmd160) mismatch for SDL-1.2.14.tar.gz
 Portfile checksum: SDL-1.2.14.tar.gz rmd160
 e4faaf504b2c05d9ce6aec79ed55ab1ef7cb8e95
 Distfile checksum: SDL-1.2.14.tar.gz rmd160
 2e3bca08655a27c542445aa9275b08da7f9ce306
 The correct checksum line may be:
 checksums           md5     1c4203d2dffbde5a333fa6e9620e38b8 \
                     sha1    8e083e9dcaff346f5bec143fc5f1808488dc99f5 \
                     rmd160  2e3bca08655a27c542445aa9275b08da7f9ce306
 }}}

 Is it safe to just update the checksums? Wouldn't it make more sense to
 just backport the fix from .14 to .13?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/21544#comment:13>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS