[MacPorts] #19813: New Port for dbxml
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Thu Apr 8 14:23:21 PDT 2010
#19813: New Port for dbxml
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: remy.apfelbacher@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
Type: submission | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 1.7.1
Keywords: database | Port: dbxml
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment(by remy.apfelbacher@…):
Replying to [comment:7 remy.apfelbacher@…]:
> Replying to [comment:6 raimue@…]:
> > You could add db46 and xercesc to distfiles instead of relying on the
other ports. Unfortunately we cannot specify `dist_subdir` per file, which
means users would have to download multiple times.
> > The included xercesc seems to be sufficient for other package
management systems.
> >
> > For example, see the
[http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dbxml/dbxml/PKGBUILD Arch Linux
PKGBUILD].
>
> So you are basically saying to add db46 and xerces2.8 to the "distfiles"
section (or which ever versions will be required), right?
>
> The both packages will then be downloaded and compiled twice. Ok, this
shouldn't be a big deal e.g. regarding disk usage. But would you also
suggest to have them installed in the non standard location/folder, so
that they will not get into conflict when the standard "db46" and xercres
ports are getting installed regularly?
To be a little more precise: the dependent libraries are already included
in the src-tgz. So no need to add them to the distfiles.
The dependent libraries could be put in a different folder (e.g.
${prefix}/share/dbxml/{bdb,xerces,xqilla}) rather than the standard folder
in order to prevent conflicts?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/19813#comment:8>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list