[MacPorts] #27709: revtex: version bump
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Tue Dec 21 08:21:36 PST 2010
#27709: revtex: version bump
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: nickolas.fotopoulos@… | Owner: dports@…
Type: update | Status: assigned
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 1.9.2
Keywords: | Port: revtex
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment(by nickolas.fotopoulos@…):
Replying to [comment:7 dports@…]:
> Replying to [comment:5 nickolas.fotopoulos@…]:
> > Replying to [comment:4 ram@…]:
> > > An option could be to make the `revtex` port a stub and mark it
`replaced_by texlive_publishers`?
> >
> > That would satisfy the discoverability criterion, but it does add
extra maintenance burden should dports want to keep the version number up
to date, which I'd encourage him to do. Also, is it common to leave
obsolete ports lying around forever merely for advertising a subset of
another port?
>
> When we mark one port as replaced_by another, we need to keep the
portfile stub around -- usually for a year or so -- so that users who have
the old port installed will see that it has been replaced rather than
simply gone missing.
>
> In such a case we wouldn't keep the version number up to date.
I think this is the best solution, even without the version information.
I'd also advocate keeping the stub as long as possible, purely for
discoverability. dports, are you willing to do this or shall I figure out
the replaced_by business? (Also, even in the revtex stub, I'd bump to 4-1
nominal version number anyway, to at least advertise the correct current
version in texlive-publishers.)
Many thanks.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/27709#comment:8>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list