[MacPorts] #24350: proposed new Portfiles for wxWidgets and wxPython
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Thu May 20 10:27:53 PDT 2010
#24350: proposed new Portfiles for wxWidgets and wxPython
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: jjstickel@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 1.8.2
Keywords: | Port: wxWidgets-python py26-wxpython
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment(by macsforever2000@…):
Replying to [comment:20 jjstickel@…]:
> Maybe I don't understand what wxgtk is: is it not wxwidgets using the
gtk toolkit? Or is it a subset of wxwidgets?
This is confusing to me as well. Maybe you are right.
> If the former, then wxgtk can be replaced by wxwidgets +gtk (see the
patch I attached to this ticket), and xchm can depend on that.
The only problem with that is that a port cannot depend on a variant. See
ticket:126.
> BTW, wxwidgets-python does not provide wxpython! It is wxwidgets but at
the version number needed by wxpython.
I see now. This is starting to make some sense to me.
Why didn't we just update the existing wxwidgets port to 2.8.10.1 instead
of adding the wxwidgets-python port again? So perhaps this could all be
cleaned up by making a new wxwidgets-gtk port that has wxwidgets (updated
to the latest version) as a dependency. We remove the +gtk variant from
wxwidgets. Then we remove the wxwidgets-python port and the wxgtk port.
py26-wxpython retains the +gtk variant and depends on wxwidgets-gtk in
that case. xchm depends on the new wxwidgets-gtk port now too and avoids
the variant issue. Can you make the proposed wxwidgets-gtk port? I'm not
sure I have the time (or knowledge) to do it myself.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/24350#comment:21>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list