[MacPorts] #30940: Reorganize 'fuse' ports
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Mon Aug 29 12:08:30 PDT 2011
#30940: Reorganize 'fuse' ports
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: anatol.pomozov@… | Owner: dports@…
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Keywords: | Port: macfuse fuse4x
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment(by anatol.pomozov@…):
> I'm not sure I see any particular benefit to having the virtual package
over declaring path: dependencies as we're currently doing.
Currently we explicitly use macfuse dependency in every filesystem port.
If we would have a virtual package then the macfuse/fuse4x dependency will
be only in one place (as default implementation of the fuse interface).
And it would be easier to change it. At least it is how it is done in APT
or some other linux package managers.
But if you think that it is ok to have macfuse/fuse4x dependency in every
filesystem port then I am ok as well.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/30940#comment:6>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list