[MacPorts] #32552: Mesa 7.11 does not compile on Tiger/Mac OS X 10.4.11 because unsupported platform

MacPorts noreply at macports.org
Sat Dec 17 06:26:33 PST 2011


#32552: Mesa 7.11 does not compile on Tiger/Mac OS X 10.4.11 because unsupported
platform
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
  Reporter:  Peter_Dyballa@…           |       Owner:  macports-tickets@…                   
      Type:  defect                    |      Status:  closed                               
  Priority:  Normal                    |   Milestone:                                       
 Component:  ports                     |     Version:  2.0.3                                
Resolution:  duplicate                 |    Keywords:                                       
      Port:  Mesa                      |  
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------

Comment(by Peter_Dyballa@…):

 Replying to [comment:3 jeremyhu@…]:
 > Yes, that should be darwin ... r88037

 Right now, around 10:30 UTC, after a selfupdate half an hour ago, I have:

 {{{
 3350046   16 -rw-r--r--    1 root     admin        5247 7 Dez 01:28
 rsync.macports.org/release/ports/x11/mesa/Portfile
 3152620   16 -rw-r--r--    1 root     wheel        5248 5 Okt 19:30
 rsync.macports.org/release/tarballs/ports/x11/mesa/Portfile

 diff rsync.macports.org/release/ports/x11/mesa/Portfile
 rsync.macports.org/release/tarballs/ports/x11/mesa/Portfile
 57c57
 < build.target darwin
 ---
 > build.target default
 }}}

 I was looking and then editing the latter, which is now "up-to-date"
 again. From 'port -vd clean mesa' I can see again that probably the latter
 Portfile is used for the build:

 {{{
 DEBUG: Changing to port directory:
 /opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/tarballs/ports/x11/mesa
 }}}

 Why do these two almost identical Portfiles exist? Is there no way to
 remove the useless variants?


 Anyway,  3 h laters, although the target "darwin" was made, I am back at
 the previous failure, just as in http://trac.macports.org/ticket/29860
 described. OK! I'll have to have a closer look later!

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/32552#comment:6>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS


More information about the macports-tickets mailing list