[MacPorts] #30383: fuse filesystems should support fuse4x as dependency
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Wed Jul 27 08:14:59 PDT 2011
#30383: fuse filesystems should support fuse4x as dependency
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: dports@… | Owner: dports@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 2.0.0
Keywords: | Port: bindfs curlftpfs encfs ext2fuse fuse-bindings-python fuse-bindings-python25 mhddfs mp3fs ntfs-3g procfs spotlightfs
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment(by anatol.pomozov@…):
> Installing the library as libfuse instead of libfuse4x would be OK, but
I don't think we need to; things seem fine as it is.
My point is that it would be better to change fuse4x only once than move
"choose libfuse vs libfuse4x" logic to existing and future Portfiles.
Original fuse installs libfuse.dylib. I changed it in fuse4x to allow
macfuse and fuse4x coexist together. As macports does not allow to coexist
these 2 ports then I do not see any reason why libfuse4x should be
installed instead of libfuse.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/30383#comment:9>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list