[MacPorts] #28469: VirtualBox-OSE 4.0.10
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Thu Jun 30 12:17:21 PDT 2011
#28469: VirtualBox-OSE 4.0.10
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: carsomyr@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
Type: submission | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 1.9.2
Keywords: | Port: VirtualBox
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Comment(by carsomyr@…):
Replying to [comment:24 rmstonecipher@…]:
> Replying to [comment:23 carsomyr@…]:
> > Replying to [comment:22 rmstonecipher@…]:
> > > SNIP
> > > P.S. - many library dependencies appear to be included in this
source.[[br]]
> > > Are all of these fixed-version dependencies required, or can
VirtualBox use dynamic libraries?
> >
> > What fixed version dependencies do you speak of? Do you mean fixed
versions like libxml-2.0?
> >
> > I've folded in your ./configure patch and updated the port archive
with the changes (see virtualbox-port-4.0.10.tgz). Consequently, I have
some questions of my own:
> > 1. I've been told in an earlier part of this thread that md5 is
obsolete as a checksum. Should it be included?
> > 2. Should post-deactivate hooks attempt to unload the port? "port
unload" doesn't seem to be invoked when VirtualBox is uninstalled. This
is kind of disturbing, since kernel modules are involved.
>
> 1. If you will allow others to periodically upgrade the port as new
versions are released, it is easiest to just edit the version and paste
the output of 'port -d checksum' which, as of now, includes md5.
> 2. Regarding unloading during uninstall, I think that's a great idea.
[http://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/audio/mpd MPD] has a
similar problem which leads to headaches during upgrades. So far for MPD
my best solution has been to reboot after upgrading - a rather inelegant
solution to what should be a simple operation. This may be worth bringing
up on the [https://trac.macports.org/wiki/MailingLists macports-dev]
mailing list.[[br]]
> Cheers,[[br]]
> Ryan Stonecipher
Ok, I am taking from the answers above that no further actions should be
taken and a solution would result in a change to the MacPorts base. Is
ticket #14774 related, by any chance? I was thinking that:
1. Unload on port deactivation always happens.
2. Reactivation happens only during an upgrade and when the previous
version was deactivated from the "loaded" state.
Let me know if you encounter any new issues with the revised port.
Looking forward to its inclusion!
-Roy
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/28469#comment:26>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list