[MacPorts] #20810: postgresql_select port request (was: postgresql83: add a variant to install binaries into ${prefix}/bin)
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Thu May 12 19:38:10 PDT 2011
#20810: postgresql_select port request
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: apinstein@… | Owner: mww@…
Type: request | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Keywords: | Port: postgresql_select
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by ryandesign@…):
* version: 1.7.1 =>
* type: enhancement => request
* port: postgresql83 => postgresql_select
Old description:
> configure.args --sysconfdir=${prefix}/etc/${name} \
> --bindir=${libdir}/bin \
>
> After install the pgsql executables are all in
> /opt/local/lib/postgresql83/bin/psql instead of /opt/local/bin. This is
> pretty annoying since I have to add the pg-specific bin dir to my path.
>
> Why aren't these droppped into bin/? Is there a name conflict with
> executables from other ports? Do you want to preserve the ability to run
> multiple pg's side-by-side?
>
> I would be OK with that decision but at least you should provide a
> variant to directly install the executables into the bin dir.
New description:
{{{
configure.args --sysconfdir=${prefix}/etc/${name} \
--bindir=${libdir}/bin \
}}}
After install the pgsql executables are all in
/opt/local/lib/postgresql83/bin/psql instead of /opt/local/bin. This is
pretty annoying since I have to add the pg-specific bin dir to my path.
Why aren't these droppped into bin/? Is there a name conflict with
executables from other ports? Do you want to preserve the ability to run
multiple pg's side-by-side?
I would be OK with that decision but at least you should provide a variant
to directly install the executables into the bin dir.
--
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/20810#comment:5>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list