[MacPorts] #32100: New port: R.app

MacPorts noreply at macports.org
Fri Nov 18 14:40:19 PST 2011


#32100: New port: R.app
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  kjell.konis@…        |       Owner:  macports-tickets@…                   
     Type:  submission           |      Status:  new                                  
 Priority:  Normal               |   Milestone:                                       
Component:  ports                |     Version:  2.0.3                                
 Keywords:                       |        Port:                                       
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------

Comment(by kjell.konis@…):

 Replying to [comment:1 ryandesign@…]:
 > You originally submitted R-framework as R.framework and we decided that
 a dot was unusual in a port name. Can this port be R-app as well then?

 I remember. I did check this time and there is already one port (Yap.app)
 that has a dot app extension. In contrast there are none that have dot
 framework. This time it's a little trickier because a lot of people refer
 to the R GUI as R.app (as in R dot app) and it's that port that I expect
 people will install -- the name of the R-framework port is not so
 important since it will get installed as a dependency. Anyway, I don't
 really understand why there is a preference (or rule? or guideline?) for
 not having dots in port names.  If you prefer to have the port named R-app
 let me know and I will make the change.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/32100#comment:3>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS


More information about the macports-tickets mailing list