[MacPorts] #32100: New port: R.app
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Fri Nov 18 14:40:19 PST 2011
#32100: New port: R.app
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: kjell.konis@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
Type: submission | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 2.0.3
Keywords: | Port:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment(by kjell.konis@…):
Replying to [comment:1 ryandesign@…]:
> You originally submitted R-framework as R.framework and we decided that
a dot was unusual in a port name. Can this port be R-app as well then?
I remember. I did check this time and there is already one port (Yap.app)
that has a dot app extension. In contrast there are none that have dot
framework. This time it's a little trickier because a lot of people refer
to the R GUI as R.app (as in R dot app) and it's that port that I expect
people will install -- the name of the R-framework port is not so
important since it will get installed as a dependency. Anyway, I don't
really understand why there is a preference (or rule? or guideline?) for
not having dots in port names. If you prefer to have the port named R-app
let me know and I will make the change.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/32100#comment:3>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list