[MacPorts] #36808: tsocks: replace by torsocks?

MacPorts noreply at macports.org
Fri Dec 21 03:26:08 PST 2012


#36808: tsocks: replace by torsocks?
-------------------------------+--------------------------
  Reporter:  ryandesign@…      |      Owner:  sami.laine@…
      Type:  defect            |     Status:  closed
  Priority:  Normal            |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports             |    Version:  2.1.2
Resolution:  fixed             |   Keywords:
      Port:  tsocks, torsocks  |
-------------------------------+--------------------------

Comment (by cm1@…):

 Unfortunately, it turns out torsocks is not a working replacement for
 tsocks for people like me who use tsocks with a simple SOCKS server. Apart
 from the fact that it doesn't allow to disable DNS forwarding (it fails
 with an error), it also contains hard-coded hacks which only work when
 used together with TOR, and even then are questionable. For example, I ran
 into a list of hard-coded IP network addresses which it refuses to open
 connections to because it's afraid something is trying to bypass the TOR
 network:

 10:53:12 libtorsocks(63158): connect: Connection is to a local address
 (10.165.132.36), may be a TCP DNS request to a local DNS server so have to
 reject to be safe. Please report a bug to
 http://code.google.com/p/torsocks/issues/entry if this is preventing a
 program from working properly with torsocks.

 Looking at the code for torsocks, it appears the author is completely
 focused in TOR use, hard-coding bits and pieces all over the place without
 adding configuration options, etc. I guess it would be more work to fix
 torsocks than simply keeping tsocks alive...

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/36808#comment:3>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS


More information about the macports-tickets mailing list