[MacPorts] #36808: tsocks: replace by torsocks?
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Fri Dec 21 03:26:08 PST 2012
#36808: tsocks: replace by torsocks?
-------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: sami.laine@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 2.1.2
Resolution: fixed | Keywords:
Port: tsocks, torsocks |
-------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by cm1@…):
Unfortunately, it turns out torsocks is not a working replacement for
tsocks for people like me who use tsocks with a simple SOCKS server. Apart
from the fact that it doesn't allow to disable DNS forwarding (it fails
with an error), it also contains hard-coded hacks which only work when
used together with TOR, and even then are questionable. For example, I ran
into a list of hard-coded IP network addresses which it refuses to open
connections to because it's afraid something is trying to bypass the TOR
network:
10:53:12 libtorsocks(63158): connect: Connection is to a local address
(10.165.132.36), may be a TCP DNS request to a local DNS server so have to
reject to be safe. Please report a bug to
http://code.google.com/p/torsocks/issues/entry if this is preventing a
program from working properly with torsocks.
Looking at the code for torsocks, it appears the author is completely
focused in TOR use, hard-coding bits and pieces all over the place without
adding configuration options, etc. I guess it would be more work to fix
torsocks than simply keeping tsocks alive...
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/36808#comment:3>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list