[MacPorts] #33241: py-omniORBpy @ 3.6 new upstream version available
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Mon Feb 13 18:01:49 PST 2012
#33241: py-omniORBpy @ 3.6 new upstream version available
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: lockhart@… | Owner: stromnov@…
Type: update | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Keywords: | Port: py-omniORBpy
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment(by lockhart@…):
Replying to [comment:3 macsforever2000@…]:
> Take a look at py-pil which is a "unified" python port using the python
1.0 portgroup and sub-ports to cover python versions 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, and
2.7. A unified version will make it much easier to keep everything in sync
with omniORB because you only have to change a single portfile to cover
all the python versions.
>
> It would be nice to move all of the functionality of the omniORB python
variants into py-omniORB port. Otherwise they would have to be installed
correctly (e.g. omniORB +python27 and py27-omniORB) to not cause problems
for users.
Grrr. The omniORB package also requires python so I started my testing
there (it currently has a bunch of explicit variants with no apparent
ability to choose "the default python installation" which the python
portgroup seems to enable.
Anyway, it seems that a port needs to live inside the python category for
python subports to work. Any suggestions for how to enable those features
in a devel/ package?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33241#comment:4>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list