[MacPorts] #31650: rose @0.9.5a
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Fri Jan 27 00:12:08 PST 2012
#31650: rose @0.9.5a
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: too1@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
Type: submission | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Keywords: | Port: rose
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by dports@…):
* cc: dports@… (added)
Comment:
Replying to [comment:2 too1@…]:
> Thanks for the feedback. I've attached a revised Portfile:
> - ROSE has been stuck at v0.9.5a for several years. The master branch
would be the best option for our users until we start versioning properly
(something we plan on doing soon). Maybe it would be better to have this
port be rose-devel?
Whether it's named -devel or not, we really need the port to install a
fixed version of the software rather than checking out HEAD from git -- we
need reproducible builds so that MacPorts knows what version a user has
installed, and so that we can (possibly) distribute binaries. The usual
way to do this would be to use a date or something as the version, and set
git.branch to the corresponding commit hash (see libusb-devel for an
example).
Other than that, the portfile basically looks reasonable to me...
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/31650#comment:7>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list