[MacPorts] #34744: glib2: libxml2.2.dylib, file was built for i386 which is not the architecture being linked (ppc) (was: xorg-server @1.8.1_1 build Failed)
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Tue Jul 17 02:47:39 PDT 2012
#34744: glib2: libxml2.2.dylib, file was built for i386 which is not the
architecture being linked (ppc)
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: macnwhite@… | Owner: jeremyhu@…
Type: defect | Status: reopened
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 2.1.1
Resolution: | Keywords: tiger
Port: glib2 |
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Changes (by ryandesign@…):
* status: closed => reopened
* resolution: worksforme =>
* port: => glib2
Comment:
Jeremy, the error Daniel wrote to the mailing list about
[http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2012-May/029065.html
was about xorg-server]; that's not what he ended up filing this ticket
about however.
It looks like Daniel is trying to build glib2 universal, and glib2 is
using libxml2, and libxml2 is not installed universal. However it is a
surprise to me that glib2 is using libxml2 at all. You added a dependency
on libxml2 to glib2 in r93908 but I still can't find evidence that glib2
is using libxml2, and [http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-
dev/2012-June/019645.html Joshua said the same] on the mailing list. I've
grepped the glib2 sources for "libxml" and "lxml" and the only mention of
libxml2 is in reference to Windows. I've grepped the main.log for "xml".
I've used "otool -L" on everything in the work directory and nothing links
with libxml2. So I am inclined to agree with Joshua and revert r93908.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/34744#comment:5>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list