[MacPorts] #36189: Failure installing ROOT with qt_mac variant
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Thu Sep 20 07:20:12 PDT 2012
#36189: Failure installing ROOT with qt_mac variant
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: angelo.graziosi@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 2.1.2
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: ROOT |
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment (by angelo.graziosi@…):
Replying to [comment:4 jonesc@…]:
> I have tried building root, on OS X 10.8, with all the gcc variants 4.5,
4.6, 4,7 and 4.8. All fail. Based on this I am tempted to just conflict
the qt_mac
In the past, I had installed:
{{{
qt4-mac @4.7.4_1+quartz (active)
root
@5.32.00_1+avahi+clarens+fftw3+fitsio+gcc45+graphviz+gsl+ldap+minuit2+mysql+odbc+opengl+postgresql90+pythia+python32+qt_mac+roofit+ruby+soversion+ssl+tmva+xml
(active)
}}}
and it worked fine... So, at least with gcc45, it worked...
Now I have qt4-mac installed as
{{{
qt4-mac @4.8.2_3+framework+odbc+quartz (active)
}}}
I would ask if they are the added variants (+framework+odbc) to do the
difference... or the 4.8 version of qt4-mac..
At the moment I can't do any test.
Ciao, Angelo.
> with the gccXY variants. However, before I do this I would appreciate
some tests from those still running the older OS X 10.7 (or even older)
versions > (which I no longer have access to).
>
> - Does the qt_mac variant build OK, without using any of the gccXY
variants ?
>
> - Does the qt_mac variant fail with all the gccXY variants.
>
> If the answer to the above is true, I will just mark the qt_mac variant
as in conflict with all the gccXY variants.
>
> Chris
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/36189#comment:7>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list