[MacPorts] #37890: RFE: General categories cleanup
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Fri Feb 1 12:18:25 PST 2013
#37890: RFE: General categories cleanup
--------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: egall@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: |
--------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment (by sean@…):
Replying to [comment:7 ryandesign@…]:
> Replying to [ticket:37890 egall@…]:
> > Also the
"[http://www.macports.org/ports.php?by=category&substr=database database]"
and "[http://www.macports.org/ports.php?by=category&substr=databases
databases]" categories should probably be combined with one another. Same
thing with the "[http://www.macports.org/ports.php?by=category&substr=ml
ml]" and "[http://www.macports.org/ports.php?by=category&substr=ocaml
ocaml]" categories.
>
> The folder name is "databases"; the 8 ports having category "database"
are a mistake and it should be fixed; no need to consult maintainers IMO
as it's obviously a mistake, and they're all openmaintainer anyway.
>
> Any category having only a couple ports in it is probably not needed and
should be removed.
>
> We have categories for individual pieces of software (perl, python,
ruby, php, etc.) when there will be tons of modules for that piece of
software; otherwise a category for a specific software program seems to be
unnecessary.
Good point. I was leaning towards that viewpoint as well since it would
simplify 'categories'. I don't currently see much value in each program
(e.g. mercurial, emacs, etc) having its own category just for a handful of
ports.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/37890#comment:8>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list