[MacPorts] #37980: Trunk breaks ports using llvm-gcc without automatically adding a dependency on macports-llvm-gcc
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Fri Feb 8 10:48:36 PST 2013
#37980: Trunk breaks ports using llvm-gcc without automatically adding a dependency
on macports-llvm-gcc
--------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: macsforever2000@… | Owner: jeremyhu@…
Type: defect | Status: reopened
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: base | Version: 2.1.99
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: mysql5 mysql51 |
--------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by cal@…):
Replying to [comment:12 jeremyhu@…]:
> Leaving it as 4.6 allows developers to see what will happen when the
next version of XCode is released, so developers have time to react.
TBH, we haven't cared about future Xcode updates previously, I don't see
why we're handling this one different. Go ahead and implement a
deprecation warning along with suggestions on how to make the port future
proof, if you want, but breaking stuff completely is not a good way to
handle this, IMO.
At the moment all we have is breakage of otherwise well-working ports and
no clear strategy on how to fix the breakage (other than in trunk, where
it was not fixed so far). Are you suggesting we should add the hack ryan
commited above to all affected ports? That doesn't sound like a good
solution to me.
> If you want to be coddled and don't want to actually fix bugs, you can
use the 2.1 branch. If you want to actually find and fix bugs before they
impact our users, use trunk.
It might have escaped your attention, but I am actually doing development
work of MacPorts base on trunk and I am actually fixing bugs. See the
Changelog. Pointing people to bugs without having a proper way to solve
them sounds useless to me, though. It's annoying.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/37980#comment:13>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list