[MacPorts] #44777: p5-xml-twig @3.39 update to 3.48 (+add p5.18, p5.20, +formating)

[MacPorts]

#44777: p5-xml-twig @3.39 update to 3.48 (+add p5.18, p5.20, +formating)
-------------------------------+-------------------------------
  Reporter:  Joel.Brogniart@…  |      Owner:  frank.mcpherson@…
      Type:  update            |     Status:  new
  Priority:  Normal            |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports             |    Version:
Resolution:                    |   Keywords:  haspatch
      Port:  p5-xml-twig       |
-------------------------------+-------------------------------

Comment (by Joel.Brogniart@…):

 Replying to [comment:4 larryv@…]:
 > Two patches in one ticket is fine. Please generate them such that the
 functional patch is applied //last//; this keeps `svn blame` useful.

 Is there a rule for Portfile file names in such a case. For one patch, I
 use Portfile.orig and Portfile to calculate the diff. But with chained
 patches do I use the same names again or could I use something like
 Portfile.orig, Portfile.1, …, Portfile?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/44777#comment:5>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for OS X