[MacPorts] #41155: Preparing for new Octave release
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Tue Jul 8 10:39:15 PDT 2014
#41155: Preparing for new Octave release
----------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: kingcrimson@… | Owner: michaelld@…
Type: update | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 2.2.1
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: octave |
----------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by egall@…):
Replying to [comment:54 sean@…]:
> A few notes about the portfile I have:
>
> - use compilers port group to set up fortran variants
Where is this done in the diff? The only place I noticed was in some of
the context lines, and I thought context lines were unchanged ones...
> - add opengl to configure.args
Personally I would wrap the addition of the `--with-framework-opengl`
configure flag in a `platform macosx` conditional, like this:
{{{
platform macosx {
configure.args-append \
--with-framework-opengl
}
}}}
That would be just for technical correctness pedantry though, as OpenGL is
only built as a framework for the `macosx` variant of `platform
darwin`.[[BR]]
I doubt that anyone is actually using octave on a platform that is
`darwin` but not also `macosx` though, so it would probably be okay to
just leave it as is.
> - disable java
Why is this necessary?
> - change ui_msg into notes
While you are at it, I would try to be a bit more balanced with the
recommendation to use the `+atlas` variant. While it may be true that the
`+atlas` variant has fewer bugs (taking your word for it), the tradeoff
that users make in exchange for the bug reduction is the commitment to
spending a really long time building the atlas port. Personally I feel
that this tradeoff is worth mentioning, but then again, I suppose that the
notes are already long enough as it is...
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/41155#comment:56>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for OS X
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list