Re: [MacPorts] #43085: MacPorts port should not be installable (was: MacPorts 2.3 »beta« already released via selfupdate ?)
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Thu Mar 27 13:07:16 PDT 2014
#43085: MacPorts port should not be installable
------------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: stephan.jorek@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 2.2.1
Resolution: fixed | Keywords:
Port: MacPorts |
------------------------------+--------------------------------
Changes (by cal@…):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
* port: => MacPorts
Comment:
Replying to [comment:2 stephan.jorek@…]:
> Ok, acknowledged - my fault, sorry. Problem solved …
You couldn't have known – the port doesn't say anything about that.
> I'm not sure, but a running (tcl) process survives the removal of its
own binaries and scripts, as long as everything has already been loaded
into RAM, or am I wrong ? Like when running the port-repl or the
migration-script I mentioned above ?
That might be true, but not every file needed might have been loaded at
this point (even though the `package require` statements are usually at
the top of our files, so that might even work).
> Yep, have it already running on my second machine … good job so far. +1
That's good to hear :)
> Good spot, and/or to make it absolutely obvious rename “MacPorts” to
“MacPorts-dev”?
I've prevented installation of the MacPorts port with a very noisy message
in r118259.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43085#comment:3>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for OS X
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list