[MacPorts] #40782: wireshark-devel: update to 1.11.0

MacPorts noreply at macports.org
Mon Aug 10 11:31:57 PDT 2015


#40782: wireshark-devel: update to 1.11.0
------------------------------+-----------------------
  Reporter:  ryandesign@…     |      Owner:  hsivank@…
      Type:  update           |     Status:  new
  Priority:  Normal           |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports            |    Version:
Resolution:                   |   Keywords:
      Port:  wireshark-devel  |
------------------------------+-----------------------

Comment (by macports@…):

 Replying to [comment:29 hsivank@…]:
 > This options are not provided by cmake (I ask myself : Is there a reason
 to disable ipv6 or ssl ?)
 Indeed, I don't see a good reason to disable them either. I'm just
 comparing to the stable wireshark port, but I'd bet very few people turn
 those off.
 > Kerberos5 breaks build for now, so it is not enabled by default
 Is that specific to the cmake build? I had no trouble building with
 kerberos enabled without cmake.
 > i agree, maybe we can make *fake* x11 and rtp variants to support legacy
 ?
 Good point, especially since your variants have more descriptive names.
 Aliases can be created if and when they are needed (e.g. variant x11
 requires gtk2).

 [[br]]Replying to [comment:31 hsivank@…]:
 > Replying to [comment:30 mojca@…]:
 > >   * `checksums`: you should use `rmd160` and `sha256`. You may remove
 `md5` and `sha1`.
 > I would prefer *official* wireshark hash (md5,sha1,ripemd160) :
 https://www.wireshark.org/download/src/all-versions/SIGNATURES-1.99.8.txt
 I had made the same call in my proposed patch. Using the same checksums as
 upstream makes it easier to compare and verify.[[br]][[br]]
 > {{{
 > default_variants +portaudio +zlib +lua +libsmi +gnutls +libgcrypt +cares
 +geoip
 >
 > if {![variant_isset qt4] && ![variant_isset qt5] && ![variant_isset
 gtk2] && ![variant_isset gtk3] && ![variant_isset no_gui]} {
 >       default_variants +qt5
 > }
 > }}}
 > Is it correct ?
 That's pretty much what the current wireshark port uses, so that sounds
 right IMO.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/40782#comment:32>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for OS X


More information about the macports-tickets mailing list