[MacPorts] #46575: submission of the Charm time tracker for Qt4 or Qt5

[MacPorts]

#46575: submission of the Charm time tracker for Qt4 or Qt5
--------------------------+--------------------------------
  Reporter:  rjvbertin@…  |      Owner:  macports-tickets@…
      Type:  submission   |     Status:  new
  Priority:  Normal       |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports        |    Version:
Resolution:               |   Keywords:
      Port:  Charm        |
--------------------------+--------------------------------

Comment (by mk@…):

 Replying to [comment:8 rjvbertin@…]:
 > For the future ... but what's the point in adding extra noise by
 prepending "patch-" to all .diff files?

 I don't need it. This is what "port lint" complains about. :)
 As the list!


 > If I understand correctly, livecheck has an option to detect new
 commits? How?

 No. If you use a version tag it is able to figure out whether there's a
 new version.

 (I haven't looked into that yet, still needs to be done.)


 > Where do the checksums come from,

 The port command computes them. You can see them in the log, or when you
 issue {{{sudo port -d extract}}}!


 > and why did you remove "/monthly" from the long description?

 I didn't remove anything, I added "/monthly", because I wondered why the
 text only contained "weekly".


 > I agree that, contrary to QtCurve, Charm could put the Qt version
 selection in a variant,

 Yes.


 > And when I say ultimately here, it's exactly that: I think we're in a
 period where at least for certain applications it *could* be of interest
 (to certain users) to have both versions installed.

 I see that point.

 This needs further discussion on the list, I think.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/46575#comment:10>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for OS X