[MacPorts] #41895: ghostscript @9.10: missing font packages
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Mon Jun 8 09:20:33 PDT 2015
#41895: ghostscript @9.10: missing font packages
--------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: gdasnon@… | Owner: takanori@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 2.2.1
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: ghostscript |
--------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by ionic@…):
Replying to [comment:11 mojca@…]:
> What *I* don't know why installing those fonts should have any influence
whatsoever.
I don't know. It's working on Debian, and Debian has those fonts, so... I
assumed that would fix it. Must be `$SOMETHING` else and I have no idea
what exactly, off-hand...
> But why did you install the std fonts in a different way than
`ghostscript-fonts-other-6.0.tar.gz`? Shouldn't the two be installed in
some similar fashion?
Because Debian does so. They install the "other" fonts in a special
directory only for ghostscript and the "std" fonts in a shared "fontcache"
directory. Probably so that other programs can use the fonts, too. I don't
know why the "other" fonts don't also get installed in the shared
"fontcache" directory, though. Maybe I should take a look at other
packagers, like FreeBSD ports, arch and Fedora to see how they do it.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/41895#comment:12>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for OS X
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list