[MacPorts] #47089: llvm-* all Poor user experience
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Mon Mar 9 22:14:03 PDT 2015
#47089: llvm-* all Poor user experience
--------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: s@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 2.3.3
Resolution: invalid | Keywords:
Port: |
--------------------------+--------------------------------
Changes (by jeremyhu@…):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => invalid
Comment:
> including a tip-of-tree version that is currently mislabeled as 3.7
What makes you think that 3.7 is "mislabled"?
> each port that depends on LLVM needing to have a variant for each
version
This isn't an "llvm" thing. The same is true for python, perl, ruby, and
a ton of other ports. That's the whole point of variants.
> except that both of those depend on llvm-3.5
Well if you want llvm-3.6, use that variant.
> I have no idea how one is supposed to know that's needed
port info will tell you about variants. Also, you could just install
both. clang-3.5 is one of the default fallback compilers, so chances are
you'll need it for something unless you want to modify your compiler
choices as well.
> Those that simply need the compiler
They pull it in via configure.compiler or blacklisting other compilers.
> Those that depend on the C API
Uh, ... no ... the host provides the C API
> Those that depend on the C++ API
Assuming you mean a newer version of C++, then yes, but that's not really
any different than #1
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/47089#comment:1>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for OS X
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list