[MacPorts] #50500: simpler up-to-date qca Port allowing concurrent Qt4 and Qt5 installations

[MacPorts]

#50500: simpler up-to-date qca Port allowing concurrent Qt4 and Qt5 installations
---------------------+--------------------------------
  Reporter:  RJVB    |      Owner:  macports-tickets@…
      Type:  defect  |     Status:  closed
  Priority:  Normal  |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports   |    Version:  2.3.4
Resolution:  fixed   |   Keywords:
      Port:  qca     |
---------------------+--------------------------------
Changes (by RJVB):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => fixed


Comment:

 In [changeset:"c802cab46968d77548eafffcce6dddc015c93d9f/macports-ports"
 c802cab4/macports-ports]:
 {{{
 #!ConfigurableCommitTicketReference repository="macports-ports"
 revision="c802cab46968d77548eafffcce6dddc015c93d9f"
 port:qca* : proposed adoption and introduction of Qt5 subports

 The QCA ports have been without maintainer for a bit now, and lack the
 possibility to install for Qt4 and Qt5 concurrently. That possibility is
 essential for the future KF5 ports, so I propose that Marko and I adopt
 this port and introduce the required changes. The ports as defined by
 the current Portfile have seen thorough testing by both of us as well as
 by a few "beta testers" of my KF5 ports.
 I don't think there is any point in maintaining the Qt4 and Qt5 variants.
 The current version also introduces a few changes that are unrelated to
 Qt5/KF5 but aim to simplify dependencies by reducing the number of
 subports. This is open for discussion w.r.t. the Qt4 versions. I don't
 think there is much justification (for use with MacPorts) to build QCA
 as a framework, but this could be reintroduced as a variant.

 Closes: #59
 Closes: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/50500
 }}}

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/50500#comment:3>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS