[MacPorts] #51856: upx port doesn't include LZMA support
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Tue Jul 19 02:56:54 PDT 2016
#51856: upx port doesn't include LZMA support
--------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: neil@… | Owner: cedric.luthi@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 2.3.4
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: upx |
--------------------------+----------------------------
Changes (by ryandesign@…):
* cc: neil@… (removed)
* owner: macports-tickets@… => cedric.luthi@…
* milestone: MacPorts Future =>
* keywords: upx lzma =>
* type: request => enhancement
Old description:
> I'm guessing this is a dependency change and build switch?
>
> $ upx -d foo.exe
> Ultimate Packer for eXecutables
> Copyright (C) 1996 - 2013
> UPX 3.09 Markus Oberhumer, Laszlo Molnar & John Reiser Feb 18th
> 2013
>
> File size Ratio Format Name
> -------------------- ------ ----------- -----------
> Assertion failed: (0 && "Internal error - LZMA not compiled in"),
> function isValidCompressionMethod, file packer_c.cpp, line 43.
> Abort trap: 6
New description:
I'm guessing this is a dependency change and build switch?
{{{
$ upx -d foo.exe
Ultimate Packer for eXecutables
Copyright (C) 1996 - 2013
UPX 3.09 Markus Oberhumer, Laszlo Molnar & John Reiser Feb 18th
2013
File size Ratio Format Name
-------------------- ------ ----------- -----------
Assertion failed: (0 && "Internal error - LZMA not compiled in"), function
isValidCompressionMethod, file packer_c.cpp, line 43.
Abort trap: 6
}}}
--
Comment:
According to `port variants upx`, the port has an +lzma variant. Did you
try installing with that?
{{{
sudo port install upx +lzma
}}}
If use of lzma is common, maybe that should be made a default variant, or
the variant removed and the functionality always turned on.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51856#comment:2>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for OS X
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list