[MacPorts] #52264: neomutt @20160910 New port as an alternative to mutt

[MacPorts]

#52264: neomutt @20160910 New port as an alternative to mutt
----------------------------------+---------------------
  Reporter:  leonardo.schenkel@…  |      Owner:  dluke@…
      Type:  submission           |     Status:  closed
  Priority:  Normal               |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports                |    Version:  2.3.4
Resolution:  fixed                |   Keywords:
      Port:  neomutt              |
----------------------------------+---------------------

Comment (by leonardo.schenkel@…):

 From a strictly maintainer perspective, naturally I would prefer to
 maintain just a single port instead of two. I see little reason for both
 to exist since `neomutt` is a strict superset of `mutt` — and in distros
 such as Debian the 'regular' `mutt` package is also heavily patched as
 well (and some of these patches were taken from NeoMutt).

 In case we go ahead with this plan, is there a way we could make one port
 an alias for the other? I try searching but I couldn't figure out how to
 do that. Should `mutt` be an alias to `neomutt` or vice-versa? What are
 your thoughts?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52264#comment:8>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS