[MacPorts] #53218: Proposal: New variant for slrn port
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Thu Jan 5 12:22:34 UTC 2017
#53218: Proposal: New variant for slrn port
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: niemda | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Low | Milestone: MacPorts Future
Component: ports | Version:
Keywords: port variant proposal | Port: slrn
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------
I propose new variant for slrn port which combines existing +ssl and
+pull, because existing +pull lacks ssl support.
Proposed change to the portfile is:
{{{
--- Portfile 2017-01-05 17:04:22.000000000 +0500
+++
/opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/tarballs/ports/news/slrn/Portfile
2017-01-02 05:55:32.000000000 +0500
@@ -34,14 +34,6 @@
depends_lib-append
path:lib/libssl.dylib:openssl
}
-# pull_ssl variant
-variant pull_ssl {
- configure.args-append --with-slrnpull
- configure.args-append --with-ssl=${prefix} \
- --with-ssl-
includes=${prefix}/include/openssl
- depends_lib-append
path:lib/libssl.dylib:openssl
-}
-
variant uudeview description {Use uudeview library to decode uuencoded
articles} {
# build dependency because uudeview provides only the static
library libuu.a
depends_build-append port:uudeview
}}}
I am testing slrn built with these options now. My personal preference is
to make ssl default option of the port, but this simple change doesn't
look very disruptive.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/53218>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list