[MacPorts] #53218: Proposal: New variant for slrn port

MacPorts noreply at macports.org
Thu Jan 5 12:22:34 UTC 2017


#53218: Proposal: New variant for slrn port
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------
 Reporter:  niemda                 |      Owner:
     Type:  enhancement            |     Status:  new
 Priority:  Low                    |  Milestone:  MacPorts Future
Component:  ports                  |    Version:
 Keywords:  port variant proposal  |       Port:  slrn
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------
 I propose new variant for slrn port which combines existing +ssl and
 +pull, because existing +pull lacks ssl support.
 Proposed change to the portfile is:

 {{{
 --- Portfile    2017-01-05 17:04:22.000000000 +0500
 +++
 /opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/tarballs/ports/news/slrn/Portfile
 2017-01-02 05:55:32.000000000 +0500
 @@ -34,14 +34,6 @@
                         depends_lib-append
 path:lib/libssl.dylib:openssl
  }

 -# pull_ssl variant
 -variant pull_ssl {
 -      configure.args-append   --with-slrnpull
 -                       configure.args-append   --with-ssl=${prefix} \
 -                                               --with-ssl-
 includes=${prefix}/include/openssl
 -                       depends_lib-append
 path:lib/libssl.dylib:openssl
 -}
 -
  variant uudeview description {Use uudeview library to decode uuencoded
 articles} {
         # build dependency because uudeview provides only the static
 library libuu.a
         depends_build-append    port:uudeview
 }}}

 I am testing slrn built with these options now. My personal preference is
 to make ssl default option of the port, but this simple change doesn't
 look very disruptive.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/53218>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS


More information about the macports-tickets mailing list