[MacPorts] #53284: shouldn't pre-configure be skipped when `use_configure no`?

MacPorts noreply at macports.org
Wed Jan 11 15:45:46 UTC 2017


#53284: shouldn't pre-configure be skipped when `use_configure no`?
----------------------+--------------------
  Reporter:  RJVB     |      Owner:
      Type:  defect   |     Status:  closed
  Priority:  Normal   |  Milestone:
 Component:  base     |    Version:
Resolution:  invalid  |   Keywords:
      Port:           |
----------------------+--------------------
Changes (by jmroot):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => invalid


Comment:

 No, it shouldn't. That setting doesn't mean the configure phase
 disappears, it means it won't run `./configure` (or whatever
 configure.cmd). You could still be using an alternate configuration system
 like xmkmf.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/53284#comment:1>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS


More information about the macports-tickets mailing list