[MacPorts] #53284: shouldn't pre-configure be skipped when `use_configure no`?
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Wed Jan 11 15:45:46 UTC 2017
#53284: shouldn't pre-configure be skipped when `use_configure no`?
----------------------+--------------------
Reporter: RJVB | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: base | Version:
Resolution: invalid | Keywords:
Port: |
----------------------+--------------------
Changes (by jmroot):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => invalid
Comment:
No, it shouldn't. That setting doesn't mean the configure phase
disappears, it means it won't run `./configure` (or whatever
configure.cmd). You could still be using an alternate configuration system
like xmkmf.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/53284#comment:1>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list