[MacPorts] #53348: OpenBLAS*: redo compiler variants
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Fri Jan 20 19:35:20 UTC 2017
#53348: OpenBLAS*: redo compiler variants
---------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: michaelld | Owner: NicosPavlov
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: OpenBlas, OpenBlas-devel |
---------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by michaelld):
I have no direct experience using the compilers portgroup; my experiences
thus far are mostly through py*numpy, and someone else set the PG usage up
so I didn't have to. If someone else wants to do the same here I'm all for
it.
In my current changes, +clang +gcc# would mean "use Clang for C/C++ and
gFortran# for Fortran", while -clang +gcc# would mean "use GCC# for the
compiler suite".
I could move to using +clang +gfortran#, where the latter requires the
former and conflicts to +gcc# ... but that seems like a lot of work for
IMHO minimal less confusion. OTOH, at least each variant would be explicit
and differentiated from all other variants, so maybe not as confusing? ...
hmmmm ... this might be worth thinking about more.
Let's get more feedback from other MP devs, if at all possible.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/53348#comment:6>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list