[MacPorts] #56378: clamav - freshclam blocked by little snitch as code signature is not valid

MacPorts noreply at macports.org
Sun Apr 29 00:52:07 UTC 2018


#56378: clamav - freshclam blocked by little snitch as code signature is not valid
---------------------------+-----------------------
  Reporter:  facelikeapig  |      Owner:  (none)
      Type:  defect        |     Status:  new
  Priority:  Normal        |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports         |    Version:  2.4.3
Resolution:                |   Keywords:  freshclam
      Port:  clamav        |
---------------------------+-----------------------

Comment (by pmetzger):

 Regardless,

 1. Allowing particular binaries to make particular connections (like to
 fetch new virus definitions) seems fine, and if you want clamav to work
 you're going to have to allow that. Further, just because something is
 signed doesn't mean it can't do mischief. Indeed, executables with buffer
 overflows in them can be made to run entirely arbitrary Turing-equivalent
 programs. See, for example, this famous paper:
 https://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~hovav/dist/geometry.pdf

 2.  I don't think that MacPorts is going to sign things. I don't even
 think, given the model under which MacPorts works, with users downloading
 and building their own code, that we reasonably could do this. One does
 indeed need a paid Apple Dev account, and we can't reasonably require that
 all MacPorts users have one.

 I think I'll be closing this.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/56378#comment:4>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS


More information about the macports-tickets mailing list