[MacPorts] #55471: Use separate portindexes for libc++ on older systems
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Sun Mar 4 08:58:02 UTC 2018
#55471: Use separate portindexes for libc++ on older systems
--------------------------+-----------------
Reporter: ryandesign | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: base | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: |
--------------------------+-----------------
Comment (by ryandesign):
Replying to [comment:2 mojca]:
> I would keep the default names at their current values and would change
the one for `libcxx` (even though: doesn't `libc++` work as folder name?)
It would. But elsewhere in MacPorts, we have adopted the convention that
"+" becomes "x" so I adopted it here. We did that in port names so that
the "+" would not be confused with the syntax for specifying a variant;
that reason doesn't apply here. I also wasn't sure if PortIndex files
would ever be transferred over http; if so, the "+" would need to be
percent-encoded to "%20", and I wasn't sure if that might introduce
problems.
> according to your proposal, except that I don't know if it makes any
sense whatsoever to do `libc++` on PPC.
As far as I know, at this time, libc++ doesn't work on PowerPC generally.
I think Ken had found a way to make it work with some additional hacking.
> It would potentially make sense to support gcc's libstdc++v3 on PPC and
that one could be called
> {{{
> PortIndex_darwin_9_libstdcxx_powerpc
> }}}
> where `libstdcxx` would stand for libstdc++v3. I don't know if we have
any explicit support for that in base though.
I don't know; I hadn't heard of that before.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/55471#comment:4>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list