[MacPorts] #53184: A cxx11-compatible clang compiler on 10.5 PPC ?Some progress...
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Thu Jan 17 18:07:39 UTC 2019
#53184: A cxx11-compatible clang compiler on 10.5 PPC ?Some progress...
---------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: kencu | Owner: kencu
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: leopard powerpc
Port: |
---------------------+-----------------------------
Comment (by kencu):
I reran the `test-suite` assessment test on the clang-3.8 PPC
installation, and found it a bit better:
{{{
Failing Tests (14):
test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT/telecomm-
fft.test
test-suite :: SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/EH/except.test
test-suite :: SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/class_hierarchy.test
test-suite :: SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count-2.test
test-suite :: SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count.test
test-suite :: SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/exception_spec_test.test
test-suite :: SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/function_try_block.test
test-suite :: SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/inlined_cleanup.test
test-suite :: SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/recursive-throw.test
test-suite :: SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_rethrow.test
test-suite :: SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/throw_rethrow_test.test
test-suite :: SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-07-VarArgs.test
test-suite :: SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-11-VaListArg.test
test-suite :: SingleSource/UnitTests/byval-alignment.test
Expected Passes : 486
Unexpected Failures: 14
}}}
The `EH` frame c++ failures are completely expected, and most of the
`varargs` failures seen before are fixed by the patch from upstream I
included.
486/500 passes is 97.2% success, and the failures are all as expected...
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/53184#comment:25>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list