[MacPorts] #59289: base does not necessarily tell you when circular dependency occurs
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Sun Oct 13 07:23:06 UTC 2019
#59289: base does not necessarily tell you when circular dependency occurs
-----------------------+--------------------
Reporter: fvaccari | Owner: (none)
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: base | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: |
-----------------------+--------------------
Comment (by cjones051073):
Replying to [comment:8 jmroot]:
> Replying to [comment:6 cjones051073]:
> > Although in this case it was not really the port itself causing the
problem, but base itself through the compiler selection it was making.
>
> Technically that choice comes from the ports tree, not base.
In this case the cmake port did not have a problem until an unrelated
change elsewhere was made, adding a new compiler option. I find it hard to
blame the port in this case.
In any case it really does not matter, assigning ‘blame’ is useless. The
bottom line there is one place that could ever detect these circular
dependencies, and that is in base, so that is the place that needs the
protection or error reporting.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/59289#comment:9>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list