[MacPorts] #63385: ld64 +ld64_xcode is there a need for +llvm variant? (was: ld64-xcode is there a need for +llvm variant?)

[MacPorts]

#63385: ld64 +ld64_xcode is there a need for +llvm variant?
--------------------------+-------------------------
  Reporter:  Gcenx        |      Owner:  kencu
      Type:  enhancement  |     Status:  assigned
  Priority:  Low          |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports        |    Version:
Resolution:               |   Keywords:  +ld64_xcode
      Port:  ld64         |
--------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by Gcenx):

 * port:  ld64-xcode => ld64
 * keywords:   => +ld64_xcode


Old description:

> For other other ld64 subports I understand the need for a version of
> llvm, but I don’t understand why ld64-xcode would require llvm-9.0,
> shouldn’t this not require llvm?

New description:

 For other other ld64 subports I understand the need for a version of llvm,
 but I don’t understand why +ld64_xcode would require llvm-9.0, shouldn’t
 this not require llvm?

 The issue is ld64 not ld64-xcode it’s self, ld64 when defaulting to
 +ld64_xcode also defaults to +llvm-9.0

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/63385#comment:3>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS