[MacPorts] #62239: readline is erroneously marked as not being able to install +universal
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Tue Feb 9 00:56:28 UTC 2021
#62239: readline is erroneously marked as not being able to install +universal
----------------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: jordanhubbard | Owner: MarcusCalhoun-Lopez
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: readline |
----------------------------+---------------------------------
Comment (by kencu):
well, I just took out the {{{merger_must_run_binaries yes}}} line, and
built it on a BigSur Intel machine:
{{{
sudo port -v -s install readline +universal
}}}
and got:
{{{
% port -v installed readline
The following ports are currently installed:
readline @8.1.000_0+universal (active) platform='darwin 20' archs='arm64
x86_64' date='2021-02-08T16:50:59-0800'
}}}
and
{{{
% file /opt/local/lib/libreadline.8.1.dylib
/opt/local/lib/libreadline.8.1.dylib: Mach-O universal binary with 2
architectures: [x86_64:Mach-O 64-bit dynamically linked shared library
x86_64] [arm64:Mach-O 64-bit dynamically linked shared library arm64]
/opt/local/lib/libreadline.8.1.dylib (for architecture x86_64): Mach-O
64-bit dynamically linked shared library x86_64
/opt/local/lib/libreadline.8.1.dylib (for architecture arm64): Mach-O
64-bit dynamically linked shared library arm64
}}}
So -- I'm not sure about when this was actually broken, or what might have
changed since then, but it all works now, it seems.
I'm not inclined at present to see what happens on a 10.5 PPC machine, as
nothing realistically builds ppc/i386 on a PPC Leopard system anyway at
present.
But if somebody really, really, really cares, then they can work on fixing
that system.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/62239#comment:3>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list