[MacPorts] #66537: Add a field to port information that specifies whether that port is distributed as a binary or requires a lengthy rebuild (was: gocryptfs always builds instead of just downloading the prebuilt binary on macOS Catalina)
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Fri Dec 23 16:32:13 UTC 2022
#66537: Add a field to port information that specifies whether that port is
distributed as a binary or requires a lengthy rebuild
--------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: esbugz | Owner: (none)
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: base | Version: 2.8.0
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: |
--------------------------+--------------------
Changes (by esbugz):
* component: ports => base
* type: defect => enhancement
* port: gocryptfs =>
Old description:
> [https://ports.macports.org/port/gocryptfs/details/] state that there is
> a prebuilt package for Catalina, and that only `macfuse` is a dependency,
> but trying to install gocryptfs triggers a complete build from source
> with the installation of all 4 build dependencies
>
> macOS Catalina 10.15.7
> {{{
> $ sudo port install gocryptfs
> ---> Computing dependencies for gocryptfs
> The following dependencies will be installed:
> go
> pandoc
> pkgconfig
> Continue? [Y/n]: y
> }}}
New description:
I thought that port details with various OS versions, for example,
[https://ports.macports.org/port/gocryptfs/details/], imply that there is
a prebuilt package for a green-check-marked system
But it's not the case, so I'd like to suggest adding such information to
the details page and the `info` commands as it makes a big difference in
installation time & space requirements
--
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/66537#comment:3>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list