[MacPorts] #65138: Pythons +universal: advice needed, should I submit a PR or not?
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Sun May 8 16:35:06 UTC 2022
#65138: Pythons +universal: advice needed, should I submit a PR or not?
--------------------------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: barracuda156 | Owner: jmroot
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 2.7.2
Resolution: | Keywords: powerpc,
Port: python38, python39, python310 | leopard, ppc64
--------------------------------------------+------------------------------
Description changed by ryandesign:
Old description:
> I have finally fixed Pythons 3.x to build as `+universal` on Leopard
> (ppc+ppc64). I don't know if I should submit a PR though, since the fix
> will either impact everyone or make Portfile unnecessarily complex.
>
> On a positive note, I got rid of a large chunk of universal voodoo (which
> way anyway broken) in the Portfile. However, my fix requires `muniversal`
> Portgroup. (Anticipating a question here: no, just adding `muniversal` to
> the existing Portfiles does not work.) I tried for a long time to come up
> with a patch to fix universal builds, an approach that worked for
> `python27` (not committed btw yet), however even though I was able to
> build Pythons as `+universal`, packages failed to install:
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/64916
> So eventually I gave up on that, and fixed an error due to which
> `muniversal` failed in their case instead.
>
> Since I have no idea re status of universal builds outside of PPC and
> general desirability of switching to `muniversal`, I am asking first. For
> PPC things finally moved forward:
> 36-111:files svacchanda$ port -v installed | grep python
>
> {{{
> python38 @3.8.13_0+universal (active) requested_variants='+universal'
> platform='darwin 9' archs='ppc ppc64' date='2022-05-08T19:54:10+0800'
> python39 @3.9.12_0+lto+universal (active)
> requested_variants='+lto+universal' platform='darwin 9' archs='ppc ppc64'
> date='2022-04-27T10:52:30+0800'
> python310 @3.10.4_0+universal (active) requested_variants='+universal'
> platform='darwin 9' archs='ppc ppc64' date='2022-04-27T09:52:51+0800'
> }}}
>
> Dependencies build as `+universal`, even the horrible `gobject-
> introspection` (though an older version which did not yet switch to
> handicapped `meson`).
New description:
I have finally fixed Pythons 3.x to build as `+universal` on Leopard
(ppc+ppc64). I don't know if I should submit a PR though, since the fix
will either impact everyone or make Portfile unnecessarily complex.
On a positive note, I got rid of a large chunk of universal voodoo (which
way anyway broken) in the Portfile. However, my fix requires `muniversal`
Portgroup. (Anticipating a question here: no, just adding `muniversal` to
the existing Portfiles does not work.) I tried for a long time to come up
with a patch to fix universal builds, an approach that worked for
`python27` (not committed btw yet), however even though I was able to
build Pythons as `+universal`, packages failed to install: #64916
So eventually I gave up on that, and fixed an error due to which
`muniversal` failed in their case instead.
Since I have no idea re status of universal builds outside of PPC and
general desirability of switching to `muniversal`, I am asking first. For
PPC things finally moved forward:
36-111:files svacchanda$ port -v installed | grep python
{{{
python38 @3.8.13_0+universal (active) requested_variants='+universal'
platform='darwin 9' archs='ppc ppc64' date='2022-05-08T19:54:10+0800'
python39 @3.9.12_0+lto+universal (active)
requested_variants='+lto+universal' platform='darwin 9' archs='ppc ppc64'
date='2022-04-27T10:52:30+0800'
python310 @3.10.4_0+universal (active) requested_variants='+universal'
platform='darwin 9' archs='ppc ppc64' date='2022-04-27T09:52:51+0800'
}}}
Dependencies build as `+universal`, even the horrible `gobject-
introspection` (though an older version which did not yet switch to
handicapped `meson`).
--
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/65138#comment:1>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list