[MacPorts] #66232: libiconv @1.17: Warning: Configuration logfiles contain indications of -Wimplicit-function-declaration (MIN) (was: libiconv 1.17 Configure warning: -Wimplicit-function-declaration)

[MacPorts]

#66232: libiconv @1.17: Warning: Configuration logfiles contain indications of
-Wimplicit-function-declaration (MIN)
------------------------+------------------------
  Reporter:  bakergilx  |      Owner:  ryandesign
      Type:  defect     |     Status:  accepted
  Priority:  Normal     |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports      |    Version:  2.8.0
Resolution:             |   Keywords:
      Port:  libiconv   |
------------------------+------------------------
Changes (by ryandesign):

 * status:  new => accepted
 * cc: ryandesign@… (removed)
 * owner:  (none) => ryandesign
 * keywords:  Ventura =>
 * port:  libiconv-1.17 => libiconv


Old description:

> Installation of libiconv on OS 13.0.1, Arm64 architecture, Xcode 14.1,
> generates the following configure warning:
>
> {{{Warning: Configuration logfiles contain indications of -Wimplicit-
> function-declaration; check that features were not accidentally disabled:
>   MIN: found in libiconv-1.17/config.log}}}
>
> config.log attached
>
> This is an example of many port installations since the OS upgrade to
> 13.0; MacPorts documentation suggests these warnings should be reported.

New description:

 Installation of libiconv on OS 13.0.1, Arm64 architecture, Xcode 14.1,
 generates the following configure warning:

 {{{
 Warning: Configuration logfiles contain indications of -Wimplicit-
 function-declaration; check that features were not accidentally disabled:
   MIN: found in libiconv-1.17/config.log
 }}}

 config.log attached

 This is an example of many port installations since the OS upgrade to
 13.0; MacPorts documentation suggests these warnings should be reported.

--

Comment:

 Yup. I expect you can ignore this warning as it relates to the `MIN`
 function.

 I'm not sure on what systems `MIN` might be defined, but I suspect macOS
 is not one of them, so we should probably add this to the global ignore
 list, but I would feel better about doing so if I found some official
 statement somewhere about it.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/66232#comment:1>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS