[MacPorts] #46469: libgcc-devel @5-20150104: ld: absolute addressing (perhaps -mdynamic-no-pic) used in _byte_common_op_match_null_string_p from ../libiberty/pic/libiberty.a(regex.o) not allowed in slidable image
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Sat Sep 10 15:29:30 UTC 2022
#46469: libgcc-devel @5-20150104: ld: absolute addressing (perhaps -mdynamic-no-
pic) used in _byte_common_op_match_null_string_p from
../libiberty/pic/libiberty.a(regex.o) not allowed in slidable image
---------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: ryandesign | Owner: macports-tickets@…
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 2.3.3
Resolution: | Keywords: leopard powerpc
Port: libgcc-devel |
---------------------------+--------------------------------
Changes (by mascguy):
* cc: mascguy, michaelld, cjones051073 (added)
Comment:
Replying to [comment:3 kencu]:
> I have built up to gcc11 on Tiger i386, bootstrapping it with the
gcc7-bootstrap port I am working on.
>
> I haven't tried Tiger/Leopard PPC, but I believe it will work as Iain
says it does.
>
> When bootstrapping with clang, the i386 builds of all newer gcc versions
(gcc7+ I think) are broken without this patch:
>
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/blob/master/lang/gcc11/files
/patch-iains-i686-clang-bootstrap.diff
I haven't looked at the history of `gcc-devel` and `libgcc-devel`, as
they've evolved significantly over the past 13 months. But is this still
an issue?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/46469#comment:4>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list