[MacPorts] #46469: libgcc-devel @5-20150104: ld: absolute addressing (perhaps -mdynamic-no-pic) used in _byte_common_op_match_null_string_p from ../libiberty/pic/libiberty.a(regex.o) not allowed in slidable image

MacPorts noreply at macports.org
Sat Sep 10 15:29:30 UTC 2022


#46469: libgcc-devel @5-20150104: ld: absolute addressing (perhaps -mdynamic-no-
pic) used in _byte_common_op_match_null_string_p from
../libiberty/pic/libiberty.a(regex.o) not allowed in slidable image
---------------------------+--------------------------------
  Reporter:  ryandesign    |      Owner:  macports-tickets@…
      Type:  defect        |     Status:  assigned
  Priority:  Normal        |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports         |    Version:  2.3.3
Resolution:                |   Keywords:  leopard powerpc
      Port:  libgcc-devel  |
---------------------------+--------------------------------
Changes (by mascguy):

 * cc: mascguy, michaelld, cjones051073 (added)


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:3 kencu]:
 > I have built up to gcc11 on Tiger i386, bootstrapping it with the
 gcc7-bootstrap port I am working on.
 >
 > I haven't tried Tiger/Leopard PPC, but I believe it will work as Iain
 says it does.
 >
 > When bootstrapping with clang, the i386 builds of all newer gcc versions
 (gcc7+ I think) are broken without this patch:
 >
 > https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/blob/master/lang/gcc11/files
 /patch-iains-i686-clang-bootstrap.diff

 I haven't looked at the history of `gcc-devel` and `libgcc-devel`, as
 they've evolved significantly over the past 13 months. But is this still
 an issue?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/46469#comment:4>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS


More information about the macports-tickets mailing list