[MacPorts] #71415: tk @8.6.14 +quartz +universal: libtk8.6.dylib is a text file (was: tk +quartz +universal installs corrupt libtk86.dylib)
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Mon Dec 30 00:35:02 UTC 2024
#71415: tk @8.6.14 +quartz +universal: libtk8.6.dylib is a text file
------------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: ned-deily | Owner: MarcusCalhoun-Lopez
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: tk |
------------------------+---------------------------------
Changes (by ryandesign):
* cc: mcalhoun@…, chrischavez@… (removed)
* cc: chrstphrchvz (added)
* status: new => assigned
* owner: (none) => MarcusCalhoun-Lopez
Comment:
I see this surprising line in the log:
`:info:destroot fatal error:
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/lipo:
/opt/macports/var/macports/build/_opt_macports_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_macports_release_tarballs_ports_x11_tk/tk/work
/destroot-arm64//opt/macports/lib/libtk8.6.dylib and
/opt/macports/var/macports/build/_opt_macports_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_macports_release_tarballs_ports_x11_tk/tk/work
/destroot-ppc-intel//opt/macports/lib/libtk8.6.dylib have the same
architectures (arm64) and can't be in the same fat output file`
They should not, of course, have the same architecture; one should be
arm64 and the other should be x86_64. And the earlier compile commands do
seem to use `-arch arm64` and `-arch x86_64` as they should.
libtk8.6.dylib isn't the only file where `lipo` complains that the two
files have the same arch; the same complaint is issued for libtkstub8.6.a
and wish8.6.
For comparison, this doesn't happen for me on macOS 12 on x86_64; it may
be specific to macOS ≥ 15 or to arm64.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/71415#comment:2>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list