[MacPorts] #69380: libffi fails on 10.5 PPC for bad patch
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Mon Feb 26 21:13:11 UTC 2024
#69380: libffi fails on 10.5 PPC for bad patch
-----------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: rmottola | Owner: (none)
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: leopard ppc
Port: libffi |
-----------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by ballapete):
Replying to [comment:22 fhgwright]:
> Replying to [comment:21 ballapete]:
>
> Actually, back when I was wrestling with `libffi` issues, I found that
the most troublesome architecture was `i386`. This may be because it's
the most register-starved architecture, and hence the one with the
kludgiest ABI.
>
With my first answer sentence I wanted to express that G4 and G5 can
handle both sorts of data MSB, as coming from earlier Motorola processors,
and LSB, as used in the i386/x86 world. This could lead to more tests for
PPC. Another case is that G4 is some kind of "64 bit aware" while G5 is 64
bit. I am not sure whether Riccardo cites "64bit" correctly for his test
results. Is his intel CPU 64 bit? If not then 64 bit tests are useless and
would not be run, decreasing the number of tests performed. On my modern
MacBook the number of tests is also quite low, which might indicate that
this family of intel processors has less things to test.
But actually I have no idea of what the tests are!
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/69380#comment:23>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list