[MacPorts] #70335: x86_64-dragonfly-binutils @2.41_0 conflicts with x86_64-binutils @2.41_0
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Sat Jul 6 20:37:26 UTC 2024
#70335: x86_64-dragonfly-binutils @2.41_0 conflicts with x86_64-binutils @2.41_0
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: cooljeanius | Owner: (none)
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 2.9.3
Keywords: | Port: x86_64-binutils x86_64-dragonfly-
| binutils
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
They both try to install the same license file:
{{{
x ./opt/local/bin/x86_64-dragonfly-size
Error: Failed to activate x86_64-dragonfly-binutils: Image error:
/opt/local/share/doc/x86_64-binutils/COPYING is being used by the active
x86_64-binutils port. Please deactivate this port first, or use 'port -f
activate x86_64-dragonfly-binutils' to force the activation.
while executing
"throw registry::image-error $msg"
("foreach" body line 47)
invoked from within
"foreach file $imagefiles {
set srcfile "${extracted_dir}${file}"
# To be able to install links, we test if we can lst..."
invoked from within
"registry::write {
foreach file $imagefiles {
set srcfile "${extracted_dir}${file}"
# To be able to instal..."
DEBUG: Error code: registry::image-error
DEBUG: Backtrace: Image error:
/opt/local/share/doc/x86_64-binutils/COPYING is being used by the active
x86_64-binutils port. Please deactivate this port first, or use 'port -f
activate x86_64-dragonfly-binutils' to force the activation.
while executing
"throw registry::image-error $msg"
("foreach" body line 47)
invoked from within
"foreach file $imagefiles {
set srcfile "${extracted_dir}${file}"
# To be able to install links, we test if we can lst..."
invoked from within
"registry::write {
foreach file $imagefiles {
set srcfile "${extracted_dir}${file}"
# To be able to instal..."
while executing
"throw [dict get $eOptions -errorcode] [dict get $eOptions -errorinfo]"
(procedure "_activate_contents" line 200)
invoked from within
"_activate_contents $requested $rename_list"
(procedure "portimage::activate" line 70)
invoked from within
"registry_activate $subport $_inregistry_version $_inregistry_revision
$_inregistry_variants $optionlist"
(procedure "portactivate::activate_main" line 20)
invoked from within
"$procedure $targetname"
DEBUG: dropping privileges: euid changed to 502, egid changed to 20.
}}}
This seems to be a common issue with a lot of the cross-binutils ports;
each one should probably have its own separate docdir.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/70335>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list