[MacPorts] #70340: Could we do arch-specific revbumps of GCCs arch-specific?

[MacPorts]

#70340: Could we do arch-specific revbumps of GCCs arch-specific?
-----------------------------------------+--------------------
  Reporter:  barracuda156                |      Owner:  (none)
      Type:  defect                      |     Status:  closed
  Priority:  Normal                      |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports                       |    Version:  2.9.3
Resolution:  wontfix                     |   Keywords:
      Port:  gcc14, gcc13, gcc12, gcc11  |
-----------------------------------------+--------------------

Comment (by barracuda156):

 Replying to [comment:1 cjones051073]:
 > Personally, I chose not to complicate the port files by going down the
 road of having to deal with arch specific revisions...

 I would be equally happy if there is just a separate revision for PowerPC,
 which is justified by a lack of buildbots, so here it does save hours or
 days of compilation. When one can simply download pre-built compiler, it
 is far less of a pain (and whether extra stress on buildbots is justified
 is not up to me to decide).

 If arch-based revisioning is undesirable, we could think of some other
 way.

 But to me it looks like sensible, not just in a context of recent revbump.
 Earlier there was a massive revbump of gcc ports due to some potential
 clang-related issue: obviously, that was also completely unnecessary for
 powerpc where clang is broken to begin with.
 On the other hand, I want to do some fix-ups for powerpc, and for those
 revbump is required – but only for powerpc, so why do it for everyone.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/70340#comment:4>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS