[MacPorts] #70539: base: failure for building some ports (depending on conditions) when Macports is installed at deeper directory hierarchy with "--prefix" option
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Tue Nov 26 20:34:38 UTC 2024
#70539: base: failure for building some ports (depending on conditions) when
Macports is installed at deeper directory hierarchy with "--prefix"
option
----------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: nanigashi-uji | Owner: (none)
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: base | Version: 2.10.0
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: |
----------------------------+--------------------
Comment (by ballapete):
I installed MacPorts 2.10.5 from source with the patch. The path is now 33
characters shorted, has "only" 140 characters. This is not sufficient for
regular use of sockets. Additional 40 or 50 characters less would make the
system practical. The component "_macports_release_tarballs_ports" (I am
rsync'ing with nue.de.rsync.macports.org) is, in French, « une quantité
négligeable ». I.e., could get lost. So that
`/opt/local/var/macports/build/nue.de.rsync.macports.org_macports_release_tarballs_ports_textproc_libxml2`
would become
`/opt/local/var/macports/build/nue.de.rsync.macports.org_textproc_libxml2`
or `/opt/local/var/macports/build/nue.de.rsync.macports.org-
textproc_libxml2` (to better distinguish, or maybe = instead of -?).
≈70 characters – I do not need more, not even on Christmas.
And it would *not* fail to display that this port comes from a local
repository. Before the change they were built in
`/opt/local/var/macports/build/_Volumes_BSD-Linux_MacPorts-
distfiles_ports_p5-...`. ≈70 characters again, because I could leave out
some designators, concentrating on Perl only.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/70539#comment:11>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list