[MacPorts] #70948: macFUSE is closed source, we should not package it
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Fri Sep 27 10:57:56 UTC 2024
#70948: macFUSE is closed source, we should not package it
------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: neverpanic | Owner: (none)
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Keywords: | Port: macfuse
------------------------+---------------------
macFUSE is binary-only non-commercial freeware starting with the 4.x
versions.
MacPorts should not package it, it exposes both us and our users to legal
risks.
For example, any MacPorts user in a company that installs the macfuse port
potentially violates clause 4 of the
[https://raw.githubusercontent.com/osxfuse/osxfuse/releases/LICENSE.txt
macFUSE license]:
{{{
4. Redistributions in binary form, bundled with commercial software, are
not
allowed without specific prior written permission. This includes the
automated download or installation or both of the binary form in the
context of commercial software.
}}}
MacPorts definitely fulfills the "automated download or installation or
both of the binary form" part of this. "in the context of commercial
software" is not well defined, and might well be understood by a court or
lawyer as "in the context of a company that develops software".
I realize this will break many ports that currently depend on macFUSE, but
I don't see good alternatives. We still have the osxfuse port that
packages the old 3.x version that seems to be open source.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/70948>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list